Primary Sources
Chaucer, G. The Canterbury Tales of Chaucer, ed. by Thomas Tyrwhitt. London, 1775.
_____. The Canterbury Tales of Chaucer, completed in a modern version, ed. by W. Lipscomb. London, 1795.
_____. The Canterbury Tales of Chaucer Modernis’d by Several Hands. 3 vols. London, 1741.
_____. The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer, ed. by W. W. Skeat. Oxford, 1894-7.
_____. The Riverside Chaucer, ed. by L. D. Benson et al. 3rd edn. Oxford, 2008.
_____. A Six-Text Print of Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales in Parallel Columns…, ed. by F. J. Furnivall. London, 1868-77.
_____. The Text of the Canterbury Tales, ed. by J. M. Manly and E. Rickert. Chicago, 1940.
_____. The Works of Geoffrey Chaucer, compared with the former editions, and many valuable manuscripts…, ed. by John Urry. London, 1721.
Chaucer: The Critical Heritage Volume 1: 1385-1837, ed. by D. Brewer. London, 1978.
Dryden, J. Fables ancient and modern translated into verse from Homer, Ovid, Boccace, & Chaucer, with original poems. London, 1700.
Eighteenth-Century Modernizations from the Canterbury Tales, ed. by B. Bowden. Cambridge, 1991.
Hoccleve, T. The Regiment of Princes, ed. by C. R. Blyth. Kalamazoo, 1999.
Lord Byron. The Complete Miscellaneous Prose, ed. by A. Nicholson. Oxford, 1991.
Lydgate, J. The Siege of Thebes, TEAMS, ed. by R. R. Edwards. Kalamazoo, 2001.
Spurgeon, C. Five Hundred Years of Chaucer Criticism and Allusion (1357-1900). Cambridge, 1925.
Secondary Sources
Beidler, P. “Art and Scatology in the ‘Miller’s Tale.’” The Chaucer Review 12 (1977), 90-102.
Chaucer and Fame: Reputation and Reception, ed. by I. Davis and C. Nall. Woodbridge, 2015.
D’Arcens, L. Comic Medievalism: Laughing at the Middle Ages. Woodbridge, 2014.
Edwards, A. S. G. “Chaucer From Manuscript to Print: The Social Text and the Critical Text.” Mosaic 28 (1995), 1-12.
Field, R. “‘Superfluous Ribaldry’: Spurious Lines in the Merchant’s Tale.” The Chaucer Review 28 (1994), 353-67.
Forni, K. Chaucer’s Afterlife: Adaptations in Recent Popular Culture. Jefferson, 2013.
Green, D. C. “Chaucer as Nuditarian: The Erotic as a Critical Problem.” Pacific Coast Philology 18 (1983), 56-69.
Harris, C. M. “Inserting ‘A grete tente, a thrifty, and a long’: Sexual Obscenity and Scribal Innovation in Fifteenth-Century Manuscripts of The Canterbury Tales.” Essays in Medieval Studies 27 (2011), 45-60.
Hughes, G. An Encyclopedia of Swearing: The Social History of Oaths, Profanity, Foul Language, and Ethnic Slurs in the English-Speaking World. London, 2006.
Lewis, F. F. Literature, Obscenity and Law. Carbondale, 1976.
Medieval Obscenities, ed. by N. McDonald. Woodbridge, 2006.
Middleton, A. “Loose Talk from Langland to Chaucer.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 35 (2013), 29-46.
Mills, D. “What is Pinteresque?” The Sunday Times (London), September 5, 1993. Features section.
Moorman, C. “One Hundred Years of Editing the ‘Canterbury Tales.’” The Chaucer Review 24 (1989), 99-114.
Mosser, D. “Reading and Editing the Canterbury Tales: Past, Present, and Future (?).” Text 7 (1994), 201-32.
Obscenity: Social Control and Artistic Creation in the European Middle Ages, ed. by J. M. Ziolkowski. Leiden, 1998.
Pearsall, D. “Theory and Practice in Middle English Editing.” Text 7 (1994), 107-26.
Ross, T. W. Chaucer’s Bawdy. New York, 1972.
Shuffelton, G. G. “Chaucerian Obscenity in the Court of Public Opinion.” The Chaucer Review 47.1 (2012), 1-24.
Sidhu, N. N. Indecent Exposure: Gender, Politics, and Obscene Comedy in Middle English Literature. Philadelphia, 2016.
Spencer, H. L. ‘F. J. Furnivall’s Six of the Best: The Six-Text Canterbury Tales and the Chaucer Society’. The Review of English Studies 66 [276] (2015), 601-23.
Trigg, S. “Chaucer’s Influence and Reception.” In The Yale Companion to Chaucer, ed. by S. Lerer. New Haven, 2006. pp. 297-323.
_____. Congenial Souls: Reading Chaucer From Medieval to Postmodern. Minneapolis, 2001.
Wakelin, D. “‘Maked na moore’: Editing and Narrative.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 32 (2010), 365-73.